Narrative Theory
A narrative is a story or account of events/experiences (whether true of fictitious) which has a beginning, middle and end. We understand and construct meaning using our experiences of reality of previous texts. Each text becomes part of the previous and the next through its relationship with the audience.
Each narrative has a series of conventions such as:
Genre
Character
Form
Time
we use these conventions to help us interpret meanings from the text. The convention time is shown through a slow motion shot or an 80 period of time can be shown through a condensed two hour biopic. There fore we consider "the time of the thing told and the time of the telling."(Christian Metz Notes Towards A Phenomenology of Narrative.) Each event must somehow be linked in order for it to work.
Each narrative has a variety of characters that perform a function which are usually:
- The Hero - a character that seeks something
- The Villain - who opposes or actively blocks the hero's quest
- The Donor - who provides an object with magical properties
- The Dispatcher - who sends the hero on his/her quest via a message
- The False Hero - who disrupts the hero's success by making false claims
- The Helper - Who aids the hero
- The Princess - acts as the reward for the hero and the object of the villain's plots
- Her Father - who acts to reward the hero for his effort
Theory 1: Tzvetan Todorov
Trzetan Todorov simplified the idea of narrative theory whilst also allowing a more complex interpretation of film texts with his theory of Equilibrium and Disequilibrium.
The theory is that the fictional environment begins with a state of equilibrium (everything is as it should be) and then it suffers some disruption (disequilibrium). After a new equilibrium is produced at the the end of the narrative.
There are five stages that the narrative progresses through:
A state of equilibrium (all is as it should be)
A disruption of that order by an event
A recognition that the disorder has occurred
An attempt to repair the damage of the disruption
A return or restoration of a new equilibrium
Here narrative is not seen as a linear structure but a circular one. The narrative is driven by the attempts to restore the equilibrium. however, the equilibrium attained at the end of the story is not identical to the initial equilibrium.
Todorov argues that narrative involves a transformation. The characters or the situations transformed through the progress of the disruption. This disruption itself usually takes place outside the normal social framework, outside the 'normal' social events.
Theory 2: Aristotle
Aristotles theory is based on common themes. Headings that are used by some producers and screenwrites include:
Inciting Incident
Dramatic Question
Charaters Goal
Antagonist/Protagonist
Stakes
Resolution
Sympathy/ Empathy
These headings are very close to thosesuggested by the father of narrative theory, Aristotle
Aristotle's literary criticism is probably most famous for "unities": time, place, and anction. Aristotle's most complete anaylsis is of 'tradgedy', which arguably the basis of more 'serious drama'
Theory 3: Vladimir Propp
Vladimir Propp was a Russian critic, active in the 1920's published his Morphology of the Folk in 1928. While the soviet cinema was producing excellent films, Propp was essentially interested in the narrative of folk takes.Folk tales were similar in many areas. Theywere about the same basic struggles and they appeared to have stock characters. He identified a theory about characters and actions as narrative functions.
Charaters according to Propp, have a narrative function; they provide a structure for the text.
- Propp's theory of narrative seems to be based in a male orientated environment (due to his theory actually reflecting early folk tales) and as such critics often dismiss theory with regard to film. However, it may still be applied because the function (rather then gender) of characters is the basis of the theory. E.g. the hero could be a woman; the reward could be a man.
- Critics argue that Propp's strict order of characters and events is restrictive. We should rather apply the functions and events randomly as we meet new narratives. E.g. the hero may kill the villain earlier then Propp expects. Changing the traditional format will change the way the text is received.
- Some critics claim there are many more character types than Propp suggests and we should feel free to identify them. E.g. the stooge in a sci-fi film, who is usually nameless and usually killer early on to suggest the power of the alien force is a typical modern character type.
It applies to Fairy Stories and to other similar narratives based around 'quests' it doesn't apply to all narratives.
Which ones apply to the group narrative?
The theory that applies to my group theory is aristotle. It links to his the theory because we have used common themes such as a stalker, antagonist/protagonist, and empathy/Sympathy. In our thriller opening our characters are going to consist of a stalker and a victim. The victim gets kidnapped and it goes into a flash back to reveal what had happened.